Sweeteners to be Reviewed: Indonesia
At one time I used to have a really sweet tooth and my doctor told me to cut down on all sugar. Good idea I thought at the time considering diabetes is on the rise worldwide, and besides, I didn’t want that!.
So I started using Saccharin to sweeten my tea and coffee. When you travel in Java there are so many delicious and sweet cakes (Kue) on sale in the shops and markets that it is hard to keep a sweet tooth in check!.
But it now seems that the inclusion of sweeteners in food products is being looked at by Drug and Food monitors. The government is currently reviewing regulations allowing the use of several controversial sweeteners in food products sold in Indonesia.
Govt may ban aspartame in food
The review, which forms part of a decades-long worldwide debate on use of three particular sweeteners — aspartame, saccharin and cyclamate — is expected to be completed later this month.
“We may remove artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame, saccharin and cyclamate, from the Health Ministry’s decree … about allowable food additives,” said Drug and Food Monitoring Agency (BPOM) head Husniah R.T. Akib.
The review will receive input from the BPOM,the Health Ministry, the State Ministry for Cooperatives and Small and Medium Enterprises, the Industry Ministry and the Trade Ministry, as well as experts from universities and non-government organizations.
The food and beverage industry, the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and several consumer groups are also involved in the process.
“We are looking at the various opinions around the world on these sweeteners. If stakeholders and people believe those three substitutes are health hazards, we will ban them,” Husniah said.
“We, the regulators, don’t have any problems with the possible ban. The industries unfortunately will,” she added.
BPOM data shows Codex Alimentarius — a set of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food production and food safety — as well as the European Union and Britain still allow the use of the three sweeteners in food production and consumption.
In Asia, Japan and Malaysia do not allow use of the sweeteners. Japan bans aspartame and cyclamate while Malaysia only prohibits cyclamate.
“In addition to Codex Alimentarius, we also refer to world agencies such as the World Health Organization, the Food and Agriculture Organization and the FDA,” Husniah said.
“There is no way can we do research on every one of the two million products in the country. We only monitor products available in markets,” she added.
University experts said studies on aspartame and other artificial sweeteners in Indonesia were rare.
The use of aspartame as a sweetener was allowed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States for the first time in 1981. This decision came under question, however, with the release of studies finding aspartame to be carcinogenic.
Cyclamate was discovered in 1937 and recognized as safe for consumption in the U.S. by 1958. However, it was banned by the FDA in 1969 when reports surfaced linking it with cancer.
Likewise, the use of saccharin has also been disputed. Canada banned it in 1977 after a study found the prevalence of bladder cancer in rats that had been fed large doses of the sweetener.
The FDA also imposed a ban, though lifted it in 1991.
“Doubts about aspartame among FDA scientists were overruled by the FDA’s management and it was given approval. Many countries soon followed suit and approved aspartame on the basis of the same flawed studies,” Roger Williams, a British parliamentarian, told the The Guardian on Dec. 15, 2005.
A 1996 review of past research conducted on aspartame found that every industry-funded study had said the sweetener was safe to consume. However 92 percent of independent studies claim one or more problems exist with its use, the British newspaper reported.
Other artificial sweeteners currently approved by the BPOM include acesulfame-K, alitame, neotame and sucralose, as well as natural substances such as isomalt, xylitol, maltitol, mannitol, sorbitol and lactitol.
Source: Jakarta Post
Related Posts
Comments
Response to Indonesian government’s action to consider banning aspartame and
other artificial sweeteners, and encouragement that the relevant and responsible medical and judicial authorities make this ban permanent, based on sound medical evidence that aspartame causes neurodegenerative illnesses like brain tumors and multiple sclerosis, and even worse illnesses.
What brilliant news, that the Indonesian Drug and Food Monitoring Agency is considering considering banning aspartame!
Physicians and legislators could recommend to the Health and Justice Ministers of Indonesia that this ban must be made permanent, because of the
long list of neurodegenerative illnesses caused by Aspartame/Methanol/Formaldehyde/Diketopiperazine, all proven brain tumor causal factors.
Aspartame was forced through the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1981 by Donald Rumsfeld, former USA Secretary of Defense, when he was CEO of G.D. Searle, the pharmaceutical corporation that owned the patent. Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes, made FDA Commissioner in exchange for his cooperation, and Samuel Knox Skinner, the attorney hired by the FDA to prosecute Searle for
fraud, who then hired on with Searle’s public relations firm at $1000 a day: these also assisted in forcing the approval for Aspartame.
Up till 1995, the FDA kept a continually growing list of consumer complaints about aspartame, and the fact that it caused brain tumors, headaches, memory loss, cardiac arrythmia, sudden death, a total of 92 symptoms, For mysterious reasons, FDA quit compiling this list, but it is still there.
Physicians like H.J. Roberts, Internist, author of Aspartame Disease, An FDA approved Epidemic, and Russell Blaylock, Neurosurgeon, Author of
Excitotoxins: the Taste that Kills, and What to do if you have used Aspartame, a regimen for aspartame poisoning victims, Dr. Betty Martini,
Founder of Mission Possible International, dedicated to banning aspartame in every nation, and many other activists and even families of those who have died from aspartame poisoning: we are all rejoicing that this is coming from
Indonesia!
We all sincerely hope that your government, whether Health and Justice Ministers or the Indonesian People’s Consultative Assembly, many of whom I have emailed on this subject, as well as having sent a digital video disc on
the subject of Aspartame’s medical damages to President Yudhoyono as well as your United Nations Ambassador: that Indonesia must make this ban on Aspartame PERMANENT.
This will do several things: it will extend the life span in your nation; it will lessen the spike and upsurge in neurodegenerative illnesses and cancers in Indonesia; it will clarify that the job will get done, whether the impetus
comes from the top epidemiologists and internal physicians in yours and many other nations, most of which have ignored the huge epidemiological
implications of adding a chemical to manufactured food products that is metabolized as methanol and formaldehyde, with proven ghastly and even more
unpredictable medical results in hundreds of millions of people, and most important, it will shine like the torch of medical imperative all over South Asia, Africa, and South America, to all of the non-alligned, non-nuclear, and less developed nations of the world, that they must stand up squarely to the ostensible superiority of corporations pushing genocidal chemicals down their throat!
There is sound evidence to warrant such a permanent ban, particularly coming from the Ramazzini Foundation for European Oncology Research, a three year study by Dr. Morando Soffriti, proving that aspartame, as well as sodium arsenite, and Coca Cola, all cause cancer.
Write to Health Minister Siti Fadila Supari and to Justice Minister Hamid Awaluddin, to ask them to make this ban permanent, and to file punitive and exemplary suits against the aspartame manufacturers and corporate endusers, to recover the costs necessary to treat victims of aspartame poisoning in your nation!
I am author of legislation in the New Mexico Legislature to ban aspartame in our state. State Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino is the sponsor of this legislation, which will be introduced as early as January 17, 2007, in the coming 60 day session, and we expect the usual phalanx of corporate lobbyists, soothsayers, and liers, saying that aspartame/methanol/formaldehyde/diketopiperazine is “harmless as mother’s milk.”
I am author of a United Nations Resolution to create a new Undersecretary General for Nutrition and Consumer Protection, which I ask Indonesia to
cosponsor in the 2007 United Nations General Assembly. This might be possible, with the Foreign Minister of Tanzania, Asha Rose Migiro, having just been appointed last week by the new UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, as Deputy Secretary General of the United Nations.
In short, you can see how a new Undersecretary General for Nutrition and Consumer Protection might actually work: to bring real truth about the medical effects of such chemicals to member nations, completely free from corporate manipulation and on going perfidy and lies about the obvious medical harm done by their products.
If I can be of further help to Indonesia or any of the other 188 nations in which we find victims of aspartame poisoning, please let me know at this email address below.
Respectfully,
Stephen Fox
stephen@santafefineart.com
[217 W. Water St.
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 USA
505 983-2002]
________________________________________
This is a very recent news story from the South AFrican newspaper, The Star:
‘Actually, it doesn’t taste just like sugar’
January 08, 2007 Edition 1
Most of us laugh off grossly misleading advertising claims as a fact of life.
But why should companies merrily get away with mass consumer deception, year
after year?
I’ve got huge admiration for the few consumers who take the time to write to our Advertising Standards Authority to complain that the face cream didn’t reduce their wrinkles as promised; the pills didn’t make them lose weight; and, in Paul Hammann’s case, that the aspartame-containing artificial sweetener didn’t taste just like sugar.
Hammann lodged a complaint against Canderel’s packaging claims that the product “tastes just like sugar” and had “no after-taste”.
In his personal experience, he said, these claims were not true.
Initially Merisant SA (trading as Canderel) submitted documents to support the claims, but later advised the ASA that both claims would be withdrawn “on a global scale” during the course of this year.
The company requested that instead of being given the usual three months to remove existing stock from the shelves, that they be given eight months to comply.
At the December 14 hearing, the ASA Directorate settled on a compromise of five months.
So by the end of May no pack of South Africa’s leading brand of sweetener - featuring those familiar claims - should be on sale in this country.
Canderel’s SA website is already devoid of the claims, and now states a watered-down: “Canderel is low in calories and delicious to taste.”
Interestingly, the brand’s UK website still carries the original claims - for now.
Last year the UK media website telegraph.co.uk posted the results of a panel’s taste test of several sweetener brands.
The verdict on Canderel? “One teaspoon gave a good sweetness to a cup of tea, but it didn’t taste like sugar.”
Hammann is clearly not alone.
Response to Indonesian government’s action to consider banning aspartame and
other artificial sweeteners, and encouragement that the relevant and responsible medical and judicial authorities make this ban permanent, based on sound medical evidence that aspartame causes neurodegenerative illnesses like brain tumors and multiple sclerosis, and even worse illnesses.
What brilliant news, that the Indonesian Drug and Food Monitoring Agency is considering considering banning aspartame!
Physicians and legislators could recommend to the Health and Justice Ministers of Indonesia that this ban must be made permanent, because of the
long list of neurodegenerative illnesses caused by Aspartame/Methanol/Formaldehyde/Diketopiperazine, all proven brain tumor causal factors.
Aspartame was forced through the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1981 by Donald Rumsfeld, former USA Secretary of Defense, when he was CEO of G.D. Searle, the pharmaceutical corporation that owned the patent. Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes, made FDA Commissioner in exchange for his cooperation, and Samuel Knox Skinner, the attorney hired by the FDA to prosecute Searle for
fraud, who then hired on with Searle’s public relations firm at $1000 a day: these also assisted in forcing the approval for Aspartame.
Up till 1995, the FDA kept a continually growing list of consumer complaints about aspartame, and the fact that it caused brain tumors, headaches, memory loss, cardiac arrythmia, sudden death, a total of 92 symptoms, For mysterious reasons, FDA quit compiling this list, but it is still there.
Physicians like H.J. Roberts, Internist, author of Aspartame Disease, An FDA approved Epidemic, and Russell Blaylock, Neurosurgeon, Author of
Excitotoxins: the Taste that Kills, and What to do if you have used Aspartame, a regimen for aspartame poisoning victims, Dr. Betty Martini,
Founder of Mission Possible International, dedicated to banning aspartame in every nation, and many other activists and even families of those who have died from aspartame poisoning: we are all rejoicing that this is coming from
Indonesia!
We all sincerely hope that your government, whether Health and Justice Ministers or the Indonesian People’s Consultative Assembly, many of whom I have emailed on this subject, as well as having sent a digital video disc on
the subject of Aspartame’s medical damages to President Yudhoyono as well as your United Nations Ambassador: that Indonesia must make this ban on Aspartame PERMANENT.
This will do several things: it will extend the life span in your nation; it will lessen the spike and upsurge in neurodegenerative illnesses and cancers in Indonesia; it will clarify that the job will get done, whether the impetus
comes from the top epidemiologists and internal physicians in yours and many other nations, most of which have ignored the huge epidemiological
implications of adding a chemical to manufactured food products that is metabolized as methanol and formaldehyde, with proven ghastly and even more
unpredictable medical results in hundreds of millions of people, and most important, it will shine like the torch of medical imperative all over South Asia, Africa, and South America, to all of the non-alligned, non-nuclear, and less developed nations of the world, that they must stand up squarely to the ostensible superiority of corporations pushing genocidal chemicals down their throat!
There is sound evidence to warrant such a permanent ban, particularly coming from the Ramazzini Foundation for European Oncology Research, a three year study by Dr. Morando Soffriti, proving that aspartame, as well as sodium arsenite, and Coca Cola, all cause cancer.
Write to Health Minister Siti Fadila Supari and to Justice Minister Hamid Awaluddin, to ask them to make this ban permanent, and to file punitive and exemplary suits against the aspartame manufacturers and corporate endusers, to recover the costs necessary to treat victims of aspartame poisoning in your nation!
I am author of legislation in the New Mexico Legislature to ban aspartame in our state. State Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino is the sponsor of this legislation, which will be introduced as early as January 17, 2007, in the coming 60 day session, and we expect the usual phalanx of corporate lobbyists, soothsayers, and liers, saying that aspartame/methanol/formaldehyde/diketopiperazine is “harmless as mother’s milk.”
I am author of a United Nations Resolution to create a new Undersecretary General for Nutrition and Consumer Protection, which I ask Indonesia to
cosponsor in the 2007 United Nations General Assembly. This might be possible, with the Foreign Minister of Tanzania, Asha Rose Migiro, having just been appointed last week by the new UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, as Deputy Secretary General of the United Nations.
In short, you can see how a new Undersecretary General for Nutrition and Consumer Protection might actually work: to bring real truth about the medical effects of such chemicals to member nations, completely free from corporate manipulation and on going perfidy and lies about the obvious medical harm done by their products.
If I can be of further help to Indonesia or any of the other 188 nations in which we find victims of aspartame poisoning, please let me know at this email address below.
Respectfully,
Stephen Fox
stephen@santafefineart.com
[217 W. Water St.
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 USA
505 983-2002]
________________________________________
This is a very recent news story from the South AFrican newspaper, The Star:
‘Actually, it doesn’t taste just like sugar’
January 08, 2007 Edition 1
Most of us laugh off grossly misleading advertising claims as a fact of life.
But why should companies merrily get away with mass consumer deception, year
after year?
I’ve got huge admiration for the few consumers who take the time to write to our Advertising Standards Authority to complain that the face cream didn’t reduce their wrinkles as promised; the pills didn’t make them lose weight; and, in Paul Hammann’s case, that the aspartame-containing artificial sweetener didn’t taste just like sugar.
Hammann lodged a complaint against Canderel’s packaging claims that the product “tastes just like sugar” and had “no after-taste”.
In his personal experience, he said, these claims were not true.
Initially Merisant SA (trading as Canderel) submitted documents to support the claims, but later advised the ASA that both claims would be withdrawn “on a global scale” during the course of this year.
The company requested that instead of being given the usual three months to remove existing stock from the shelves, that they be given eight months to comply.
At the December 14 hearing, the ASA Directorate settled on a compromise of five months.
So by the end of May no pack of South Africa’s leading brand of sweetener - featuring those familiar claims - should be on sale in this country.
Canderel’s SA website is already devoid of the claims, and now states a watered-down: “Canderel is low in calories and delicious to taste.”
Interestingly, the brand’s UK website still carries the original claims - for now.
Last year the UK media website telegraph.co.uk posted the results of a panel’s taste test of several sweetener brands.
The verdict on Canderel? “One teaspoon gave a good sweetness to a cup of tea, but it didn’t taste like sugar.”
Hammann is clearly not alone.